that &%h is *&%(^% guilty as sin. I dont know who paid the jury, but that is absolute crap.posted almost 5 years ago
Even if she were innocent, she didn’t seem like a decent mother. She lied a lot to cover up “nothing”. She had no real job and couldn’t take care of her child and still wouldn’t let her parents take care of a grandchild they loved? Ridiculous.posted almost 5 years ago
She is guilty! It’s hard for me to watch stuff about her cause she bugs me so much!posted almost 5 years ago
i will never be able to understand how she could do that to her own child. even though they said that she was not guilty, i don’t think she will ever be “free”. she’ll be walking around but everyone will know what she did. some people may even approach her and try to harm her. now she always has to watch her back.posted almost 5 years ago
There is no evidence that proves that she killed the child . NONE. That’s why she didn’t go to jail; because the prosecution didn’t have any conclusive evidence to properly convict her. All the evidence provided was CIRCUMSTANTIAL. Therefore, the jury cannot be blamed. One cannot send someone to jail just because they THINK they did it.
No, I don’t think she’s completely innocent, but I’m not going to sit here pretend like I KNOW for a fact that she killed the child like some people are. I think the saddest part of it all is that a lot of the people “following” the case, really don’t even truly understand why she didn’t go to jail, meaning that they didn’t really follow the case. They don’t care enough to understand what’s going on, but they care enough to threaten the life of an individual, making them no better than the person accused of murder.
Given the information provided, I can say that she’s a liar and a bad mother. But a murderer? That remains to be seen.posted almost 5 years ago
Agreeing completely with Totallyoutcasted here.
I also find it highly disturbing that some of the followers are baying for blood and wishing all kinds of atrocities on her.posted over 4 years ago